Richard Vanek - Black and White Photography

«  November 2006  »
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930 
Archive

Tuesday, 14th November, 2006

why this and not that
[posted at 21:55 GMT]    

It is late evening, I am again rather tired, but do not want to go to bad yet. Scanning some films I have developed yesterday and feeling blue after having almost hour telephone conversation with my old friend. Neverplaces 1 by Mihai Mangiulea Actually based on his phone call I have come to computer and start looking at some photographers works. Also today Daniel told me about his succeed with selling his prints which were exposed, and some still are, in cafe near by Oslo in Norway.
But back, I wanted to write about why some photos are better appreciated than others. Or not even that, maybe I was just wondering, why from so many photos, which are produced, only few take that certain attention, which brings them to the front. First one is nice picture when you look at it. After while I though, well, what is actually on the photo? Feels bit strange thanks to the focus so typical for large format cameras. So technically is interesting, but I am loosing interests because it doesn't tell me anything more. Doesn't surprised me either, doesn't leave me thinking. When I on the other hand see photos like the second one feels much more alive. I started to think what is going on is she taking bath or something happen. So there is a little secret as addition to perfectly technical and composition image.
Than you look at style of photos, how they are presented. Some playes with sharpness as whole, some only in parts, some have very high contrast. Some others has really very define style typical for certain author. Sure think is if author has typical form which also fits the contents of image than is a big plus.

Madeline's Hair, 2000 by Peggy Washburn So if I summarize this little bla about what make goo photo good in my view, I can say that having own distinct style and produce images which has secret and can tell you or your imagination more than what is directly see on picture is great plus. To produce such images one needs to have something to say and needs to have own way of saying that.

Does that have any sense? Will see tomorrow...