Richard Vanek - Black and White Photography

«  April 2006  »
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
Archive

Thursday, 27th April, 2006

extra sale
[posted at 11:12 GMT]    

Sometimes things get brighter. Yesterday I have received mail from Japan, telling me that my new web site www.richard-vanek.eu is rendering ok in his browser. And he also purchased by email three prints. Two of them I never offer for sale, so I need to work on them. It is nice when people like my work to such a extend that they invest money in it.
I am very glad, maybe at the end I will be able to finance my new tripod anyway ;-) Now, work is in front of me.

daniel staver new web page
[posted at 12:22 GMT]    

My friend from The Norway has updated his web site daniel.staver.no. He use to have nice black and white dramatic views. Now you can enjoy his great romantic color shots with a slice of drama in them. I like his work very much. Feels very dreamy and brings nice feelings. And not forget to take his RSS feed in your feed reader.
His site also contains curves for printing with epson 2100/2200 printer and QTR RIP with ink sets from MIS.

grain and search for holy grail
[posted at 21:06 GMT]    

Yesterday when I was scanning 'Offices in the North' photo I realize fact which was clear to me already for long time. Not that it would be surprising, but it pop-up so strongly yesterday that I like to write about it.
The above mention photo was exposed on Kodak TMY film and developed in Kodak XTOL 1:1 developer. I use to work with this combination for quite some years. As far I remember 2003 was last year, than I have switched to Fuji Neopan and Paterson Aculux II. SO the photo was so grainy that it surprised me a lot. TMY is good film and Xtol is known for lower grain capabilities. As I scan it I realize that shot was underexposed quite a lot. It is difficult to say but one or one and half stop more would help a lot. And that I think was the fact why grain pop-up so strongly there. On several message boards you can find never ending discussion about which developer which film and asking for examples times. It all has no sense. Important thing is to understand how you camera work and work with same developer and film for at least 50 rolls to get it all known. Experiment and think why you have got what you did. Only that can teach you what to do to get result you like.
Yes certain films/developer combination have very specific characteristics which can be more appealing, but if you do not know that combination you do not necessary have to get it. And it doesn't matter that somebody who shows you shot was successful. You need to really try it and think.
I learn a lot by doing a lot of shots. And even I am talking here analog photography, in digital world the principal is the same.

I, for example, was using one camera for longer time and was getting nice results on Kodak 125PX film. Really great. I than switch to different camera and results where different. I say myself what is the problem. I did test, try and realize that old camera was giving almost half to one stop more exposure than new one. So it means if new is exposing Kodak 125PX as 125 ASA film, the old one was handling it as 64 ASA film. And than I realize that my development times I used for the same film are shorter that suggested by Kodak. And I try to set new camera and gave half stop more exposure and I have got the same nice results.

In this case it was camera in other case it can be different water, temperature, the way how you agitate tank, or you use different tank, Thousands things. All are more or less important, but to get what you want you need to try and experiment! So go on and enjoy those few minutes of waiting until surprise came out of the tank.